Coal Energy or Nuclear Energy: Which energy source is more controversial?

  • Coal Energy
  • Nuclear Energy
Please select one to answer and see the result

Answers

Coal Energy - 6Nuclear Energy - 19
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it can't be created nor destroyed
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Even though nuclear energy can/is dangerous, coal provides a larger disadvantage when looking in a longer time-frame.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
a
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
dunoo
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
ift8q3
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Sulfur content in coal is a real killer!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
people are scared of the waste although it is a much better form of energy.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The dangers of Nuclear look no further then Chernobyl Prippiat almost 30 years later still the dead zone with high levels of radiation.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
There's a stigma around nuclear energy because of the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters, even though one of those was due to stupidity and the other was due to a natural disaster.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
WE ARE CREATING A HOLE IN OUR PLANET COAL IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST ISSUES THAT CONTRIBUTES TO GLOBAL WARMING.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
why not
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
There can be nuclear energy meltdowns in plants and there is no right way of nuclear waste disposal.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
the public is uneducated
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
cause that **** da **** ****...
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
bcz I can
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
s
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Recent Japan Fukushima meltdown raises issues on huge risks of having a nuclear meltdown.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
dunno who really cares
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because even a small accident can be devastating to the genetic make up of any species nearby.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Most modern day "average" people would run and hide from anything containing the word "nuclear". It is safe to say that 95% of the world population knows absolutely nothing about nuclear power. Funny thing is, these ignorant souls are the first ones to shout out loud about how bad nuclear power is, when nuclear power itself is the safest and most environmentally conservative choice for energy generation. I dare anyone to take a tour on a nuclear power plant. A nuclear facility is one of the most advanced manmade structures ever built, taking on average 20 million man-hours to PLAN, plus a good half-decade to build. Unforeseen occurrences has led to only 3 major nuclear plant meltdowns which has left a microscopic mark on the environment compared to what coal power plants have done. We will all proper once society matures and realizes the full potential of nuclear energy.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Now I am back nuclear is better because... dang it!! :(
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because coal ah... ah I,m leaving.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it just is
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it has more advantages than coal.
We are rapidly depleting our energy resources and striving hard to find new and cheaper alternatives. Currently we are dependent on fossil fuels to fulfill our energy demands such as petroleum, natural gas and coal. We can generate energy from coal for industrial use. Coal is found in four forms, which are: ignite, bituminous, anthracite and graphite. Each type of coal is specified according to its moisture content, volatile components and carbon percentage. As fossil fuels are non-renewable energy source, scientists are switching to nuclear energy. It is produced as a result of splitting or fusion of atomic nuclei. Although hazards and advantages of nuclear energy are debatable but still no one can deny its potential as future energy source.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
nuclear energy cause more world issues, since it can produce power to develop military weapon such rudal?

Related Questions

Related Comparisons