IMDB or Rotten Tomatoes: Which website has better movie reviews?

  • IMDB
  • Rotten Tomatoes
Please select one to answer and see the result

Answers

IMDB - 79Rotten Tomatoes - 41
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It’s not a binary review system
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More balanced.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDb shows the information of the movies of all around the world. I can easily know about a movie which is not in my native language from there but Rotten Tomatoes doesn't have that for all the movies. That keeps IMDb ahead of Rotten Tomatoes to me.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
cuz
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I have never found rotten tomatoes reviews useful. Always underrate the movies and it if often more misleading than anything when trying to find out more about a film.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Rotten tomatoes has poor reviewers.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
...
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Cu it true
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Its has a lot more factual results
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
B

  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Critics are not always right about movies.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Ok
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
it's better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
, m
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDb: easy Rotten tomatoes: too hard
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDb Is better than rotten tomatoes
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
g
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Quite frankly it seems to me that the viewers on IMDB are far more mature.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Better user interface. More accurate reviews.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because aliens got dropped down from an 100% to 98% on rotten tomatoes because of this evil guy named gene siskel
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More professional
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
l
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
logic
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I easily agree with most of there reviews.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
idk
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
While some people may consider RT's review more 'accurate', but I'd take the general public's word over many a critic any day.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The ratings are more realistic and accurate
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
easier navigation better search options
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDB is the best because it is built for users, because exist a lively community around it...
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Rotten Tomatoes is just too negative, IMDB gives a better rating overall and lets you check what demographic liked a movie also.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Critics do not express he audience opinion.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
dasdasd
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDB because its more of a democracy as it allows everyone to have a
say, unlike RT which mostly only has critics rating movies
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
i think it has better choices
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
They aren't ridiculous
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDB has a better rating system and IMDB's users reviews are in my opinion way more honest than the "recognized members of writing guilds or film critic groups" from rotten tomatoes
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it's rating are much more reasenable than rotten tomatoes
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Actually, to me, they're worldwide #2 after Allocine, a french site, but IMDB is really exhaustive, that's why they're good.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I have tried both and most times IMDB was more accurate.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
My ****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Seems to represent my interests better and never fails me when trying to find a movie where as in rotten tomatoes high rated movies are sometimes **** and percentages seem inconsistant
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
becoz its all abt muvs ,muves & muves not abt **** tomatoes :-P
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
IMDB have TOP250
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Movies are made for the viewing public. That's who pays money to go see them. I care if it was entertaining and enjoyable and so do most who rate movies on IMDB. A critic's idea of a good movie is often VERY different than your average Joe's idea of a good movie. So Rotten Tomatoes, which relies heavily on critics for input, generally misses the mark and often underrates a good movie.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I believe IMDB is better only because I'd rather know what the average user feels about a review than a film critic.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Rt too harsh
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
coz its the ****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** rotton T
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Has user reviews, links to metacritic.com, and then links to external reviews. Easier to get an easy to evaluate range of opinions and plot summaries
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Older and better.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
In general, ratings seem to be more realistic.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
nice movie site
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
more public
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
is best
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The main issue in this case is not a matter of why IMDB is better, but why Rotten Tomatoes is worse. The pre-reviews (those that appear on movie 2-3 weeks before their release) always set the tone of the main reviewers - who seem more likely to jump on the bandwagon than write their actual thoughts. The system, assigning a rating based on the number of people that giving the movie a passing grade is rediculus and leads to movies appearing to have rating far higher or lower than they actually should. Ie: everyone thinks a movie a 60% quality movie, therefore it gets a 100% rating. This applies on both ends of the extreme.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I have more respect for the reviews of the general public, not some film critic who decided an action film was terrible because it had too much action, or some comedy wasn't funny because it didn't have enough drama in it. I want a review from a person like me, who thinks like I do. Every review is special to that persons interests, so when I read a review from some critic it really isn't anything special to me.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It has users to choose which one is the best unlike Rotten Tomatoes. A particular individual may like the movie and another maynot like the same. Then what about rating by particular people from big publication houses. Let the movie buffs rate the movies.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Its way better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Amazon supported
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
wealth of information
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
They are not even comparable!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
before watch the movie i watch the rating of the movie,after watching movie many times i think that the rating given by imdb is good.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I love being able to see the voter demographic.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
b coz it's the best ...
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It's environmet... awesome. I get about the film I need
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More Reviews, so, the final result gets more acurate
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Its user friendly
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** brilliant
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
the combined opinion of thousands of movie goers weighs more than the opinion of a few dozen movie critics
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because the way rotten tomatoes gives a movie a rating is flawed.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More information
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
ecause its better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Scale
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because of yah mum
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
rottentomatoes doesn't look good at all.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
it answers all movie queries
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Rotten Tomatoes just self sabatoged their whole website with the latest update.

Congrats IMBD. This will finish them. It's aweful.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because it shows the likelihood that a film will be good, not changed by a slight score change like the IMDb rating would be.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Becuase it’s moor akurate. Me no no how 2 spel 👉
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Main focus is movie reviews, not celebs and etc
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More reviews from people who understand the industry.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
becus tomatos ar heltheeir than immdbz
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
more accurate than imdb.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
fy
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
i tend to agree more with rottentomatoes, I often see some of my favorite movies with a low score on imdb
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
it rules
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
fresher perspective
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because :)
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I have used both IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes over a 5 Year time span. Rotten Tomatoes reviews are approx. 90% accurate with my personal review as IMDB is 75%.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
hhhh
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Viewers now better then the "experts" or critics. I go by viewer rating
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** off
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
cool
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
imdb offers more of general reviews of the crowd where as rotten tomatoes offers more movie critics
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I trust professionals more. It has happened more than once that I found reviews on Imdb to be misleading.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It shows the professional score for the movie, and the audiences. To be honest id rather see the professional insight than someone else, that is why Rotten Tomatoes is far superior to imbd.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The Tomatometer helps me to decide easily which movies to watch!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Reliability, dependability, and credibility. Apart from critics, users are also allowed to submit reviews, rate the movies, and offer feedback, and the comment section is often very resourceful as well.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because it is more critical
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
good one
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Imdb data is "polluted" by spam from fanboys; and typically extremely polarized reviews - either 0 or 10. I also trust film critics to give more unbiased reviews as opposed to user reviews; where mainstream movies get too much recognition.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The main reason I think Rotten Tomatoes is better is because I feel it offers more opinions on every movie. IMDb doesn't review films very well, and reviews are what I'm after, whereas Rotten Tomatoes has reviews galore!!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because they have a splendid Movie summary review, in 2 sentences you get an idea of the how good the movie is. Because Rotten Tomatoes two different ratings, one for the critis and one for the users. Becase of this, you can get an overall better picture on if you like the movie or not, because a bad rated movie could have high user reviews and thus being good afteral. I also like Rotten Tomates actor pages, since when clicking on an actor, you get a list of all the movies the actor have played in, BUT, with the film ratings besides the movie title, on IMDB, you need to click onto that movie to actually see the ratings.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because its more sofisticated
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
there better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Dumb people on IMDb
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it goes into complete details.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Avatar.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
better
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
can't be explained as such
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
less idiots
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Clearly Rotten Tomatoes cuz they have their reviews from professional critics.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Simple and honest
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** u
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I simply find that IMDB ratings are to unreliable to be of any use

Related Questions

Related Comparisons