Nike vs. Under Armour: Which is better?

  • By reComparison Contributor
  • comments 12
  • views14487

Difference between Nike and Under Armour

Nike is a sportswear company that stands alongside many other famous brands as one of the top manufacturers of sports related equipment in the world. While it would seem that such an industry giant would be hard to compete with–let alone to topple–a number of entrants have made their own hefty marks on the scene. Take for example Under Armour, which is fast making inroads into the market previously dominated by Nike. Does the company have what it takes to measure up? Let's see!

Nike
Under Armour

Focus

Nike is unarguably the number one manufacturer of sports shoes in the world, having cornered as much as 20% of the athletic shoe market. The company’s lineup includes shoes for basketball, baseball, golf, hiking, tennis, and football among others. Under Armour for its part seems to be more focused on the athletic apparel market, and it is one of the major players in the compression garment industry.

Nike goes beyond athletic shoes as well, with a fairly respectable line of sports related clothes, equipment and accessories. As for Under Armour, the company has also seen fit to delve into the sports shoe market, with a pretty good selection of cross-trainers in its lineup.

Comparative Strengths

Unsurprisingly, Nike has the edge over the competition–Under Armour included–with its vast selection of sportswear and footwear. While Under Armour does carry products that compete with Nike in the football, lacrosse, and softball shoe department, Nike also offers shoes for basketball, golf, track & field, and several other sports, areas in which Under Armour has no presence at all. To Under Armour’s credit however, the fact that it has cornered a pretty respectable niche of its own is a definite accomplishment, especially since the company has been in business for only a relatively short period of time.

Market Value

Under Armour is capitalized at $1.28 billion, which is a far cry from Nike’s capitalization of a whopping $26.38 billion. While this would seem to put Under Armour at a strict disadvantage compared to the sportswear giant, Under Armour does seem to have the edge in terms of potential for expansion. While Under Armour definitely has a long way to go before it can reach the level of Nike, recent market performance shows that it may just come out strong in the years to come.

Summary

Nike

  • Has cornered more than 20% of the athletic shoe market in the United States
  • Focuses primarily basketball, baseball, golf, hiking, tennis, and football shoes
  • Also offers a selection of sports-oriented clothes, watches, equipment and accessories
  • $26.38 billion capitalization.

Under Armour

  • Fast making its mark as a manufacturer of quality sports apparel
  • Has managed to corner a large portion of the compression garment industry
  • Expanding into the shoe with its own line of cross-trainers
  • It hopes to grab 10% of the sportswear market
  • $1.28 billion capitalization

Nike Commercial

Under Armour Commercial

Which brand wears the longest?
  • Nike
  • Under Armour
 
 

Discuss It: comments 12

NIKE NIKE NIKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UNDER ARMOUR STINKS

  • Guest
  • UA vs Nike wrote on November 2010

Nike is always going to be bigger, but Under Armour is going to hurt them a lot in the future.

I'm sick of Nike personally. I wore Nike sneakers for years but lately they haven't been very good. Just tired of the swish everywhere. Under Armour seems to make great gear and apparel. Many people like Nike just because of the stupid brand loyalty nonsense. Not because Nike makes better products, but because they're Nike! Ridiculous!!! Wish Under Armour would have gotten the NFL apparel contract for 2012!

  • Guest
  • Brand Crown wrote on January 2011

I'm a big fan of Under Armour but I have to say that you can't beat Nike for its clothing line. We have developed a site so you can vote our favorite, check it out http://www.brandcrown.com/brandBattle/1532/Under-Armour-VS-Nike

Hi All,

I still wear Nike but have also introduced under Armour to my sports wear I think they can both coexist in the market but bad news for the other potential big boys.

nike may have been longer than under armour but under armour's shoes are way better than nike's

nike can suck it!!!!!!!! nobody can mess with UNDER ARMOUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

UA is growing rapidly

Nike is worth it's weight in gold. I work for Nike, and not only are the shoes amazing, but the clothing along with all other accessories are cutting edge. Nike has been expanding rapidly ever since Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight founded the company in 1964. Under Armour may try to one-up Nike all they want, but it will take YEARS for them to advance to the level of Nike. No signs of Nike slowing down at all in years to come. Under Armour does have select products which are adequate, but when you compare side by side both companies, Nike will exceed every time.

LB43, you're obviously drinking the Kool-Aid, dude. Have you looked at each company's growth over the last few years? While I will admit it's much easier for Under Armour to grow quicker because it's much smaller, you can't argue that Under Armour is a juggernaut that is just getting started. One only has to go the gymn and see what people are wearing to realize that Under Armour is coming on strong. I made the decision to switch to Under Armour exclusively a few years ago when Nike refused to drop Tiger Woods as a sponsor. Its loyalty to a morally reprehensible person like Tiger spoke volumes about Nike's culture, and I want no part of it.

There is a big part of the equation everyone has left out here. Under Armour started the performance apparel industry. Before UA, there was only cotton tee's and other inadequate comparisons. UA was the FIRST to introduce compression in the way it is used now. UA was the FIRST to introduce moisture wicking product that dried at the speed which it does. UA continues to be the first in pioneering new materials and products that cater directly to the athlete's goals/sport. All of the other companies, including the Nike giant, are only copying what UA pioneers, on a yearly basis! UA has some wrinkles to iron out in its footwear division, but as a young company they have plenty of time to make it up. Not to mention, UA has only been in the footwear division for 7 years (since 2006). Nike has been around for 41 years, therefore, has the money at this point to afford the athletes and marketing initiatives to capture the attention of all athletes around the world. UA is only 16 years old and is changing the way the industry works every year. As far as I am concerned, Nike and the rest of the now-existant performance industry (thank you UA) should keep their notepads and pens in-hand, because I'm sure UA will only continue to introduce the next best thing while it's competitors copy cat. Haters of UA can hate all day long, but what they don't realize is the companies they stand by took and still take UA's ideas and innovation and are trying to replicate what UA pioneers. Imagine if you were 41 and a 16 year old was schooling the way you do business...UA is a beast and Nike will keep copy-cattin' until they can't keep up anymore.

Post a Comment
  • Name*
  • Email*
  • Website (optional)
  • arrow You are commenting as a Guest
  • arrow Your email will not be public
  • arrow Login or Sign Up and post using your reComparison account
  • arrow Facebook Connect