Pressure Cooker or Slow Cooker: Which cooker is more useful?

  • Pressure Cooker
  • Slow Cooker
Please select one to answer and see the result

Answers

Pressure Cooker - 13Slow Cooker - 3
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Much quicker cooking time!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because is so fast and if you are hungry you can wait a minute instead slow cooker if you are hungry you cannot eat so quickly
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I do not always have time to plan things out and even when I do, we sometimes change what we have a taste for. I can have an unplanned, one pot meal on the table in 30-45 minutes.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because of the speed
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Busy work and family life
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
quick method of cooking
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Cooking certain foods for hours at very low temps degrades the flavor. People who are used to eating a lot of canned food probably won't notice, but nothing from the slow cooker ever tastes very fresh.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Great for spur of the moment!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I guess time is the main reason. Pressure cooker can prepare food much faster.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Faster
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Reading the differences made me to pick the pressure cooker as the useful cooker.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
more convenience
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
faster time is more practical for busy families which 75% of American Family are.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
That is what I have.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Not to be rushed
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It is safe

Related Questions

Related Comparisons