I have never heard of Miele until a friend bought one. It sounds like the Miele is more durable, picks up small grains better and is quieter. I don't know how the Miele might perform when the bag is quite full. It looks like it might fit better under tables and sofa's. Dyson is cheaper and I one does not have to change bags. I guess if I had more money I might go with the Miele. But I don't.
better at marketing in north america
Dyson are the top of the line, are known as the suction beast because cyclone technology .
The inner cyclones on the uprights near the handle bar that says " dyson" produce wind speeds up to 180 mph!!!!
That's insane!! The other thing is that they are made of polycarbonate or " liquid steel"
Dyson are the top of the line. Don't have bags which are very BAD and expensive to replace.they have a hepa filter which cleans the air as you use it. The suction is extremely powerful,in the upper cyclones just under the clear handle bar where it says "dyson" , the top wind speed is 180 mph in the dc33!!!!
Dyson because they are bag less and have extremely power suction.the inner cyclones just under the clear handle bar where it says "dyson" has a top wind speed of 178 mph
adverstising is much more extensive for this make
I answered the question. Dyson advertises therefore it is more famous.
although the miele to me is a better vacuum the dyson is a lot more affordable. and has more obtainable places to buy it. however if the miele became more famous i believe the product would later suffer..
In the U.S., where I live, Dyson is much more marketed and well known. However, in Europe Miele is definitely more well known then Dyson.
With their new technology, bagless and ball powered consumers are drawn to the brand
Because there is definitely more advertising that Miele.
Because i have it.
I had never heard of Miele until a friend received a Miele vacuum as a gift, whereas I saw Dyson ads years ago.
I have one and love it!!!
