Atomic Bomb or Hydrogen Bomb: Is there any need for this kind of inventions ? who say that ? why ?

  • Atomic Bomb
  • Hydrogen Bomb
Please select one to answer and see the result

Answers

Atomic Bomb - 15Hydrogen Bomb - 60
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The earth is flat and the holocaust never happened. sticks and stones may break my bones but there will always be something that offends a feminist.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Although such incidents highlight the dangerous nature of the weapons as well as the improbability of them being used sace by accident or misunderstanding...[bell rings]
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
2 types do diffnets types of destucton and miles of one time 5000 or 10,000
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because the atomic bomb evokes into the hydrogen bond. The H Bomb literally needs the H Bomb
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it is less dangerous than a hydrogen bomb
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because if we didn't have it we would have not ended world war 2 and would not have furthered research on peaceful uses as well as the ultimate goal of Nuclear Fusion like the sun for a endless power source.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it was the start of the nuclear bombs and it was a great leap forward but it will soon be replaced again like how the hydrogen bomb replaced the atomic bomb sooner or later the new great leap will come again
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Strictly as a deterrent
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
in order to destroy things, but keeping safe.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Probably not. All that we (humans) are doing now is stocking up our nuclear arsenals in the hope that no one will use them.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
what is stronger an atomic bomb or a hydrogen?
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Its dangerous, and can lead to our destruction. Also, you cant have a Hydrogen Bomb without the Atomic.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Less destruction
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
atomic bomb bec. it is used in electricty
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
World is better with out these bombs
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
ggg
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
there cool and need to go **** people
up
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More power
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
much more power with few limits on how powerful
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
lol
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Keep it safely tucked away for the future of our world and the human race There might be peril by and who knows when.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Peace through strength. The bully will always enslave the weak, unless the weak have better weapons.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
No Way, it is total madness and Mutually Assured Destruction. The human species must have some strange inbuilt suicidal impulse. The half life of plutonium 239 is 25,000 years - I fail to comprehend how the use of these weapons and consequent highly radioactive, destructive and long-lasting fall-out can even be countenanced by a 'sane' civilization.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
i have selected this answer because if any country attacks on another country so that country can protect himself through hydrogen bomb.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
it is important for an country to defend himself from terrarists.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
i have select this answer because there is need of hydrogen bomb but when we fought a war. many countries are not having this type of bombs in case if any country attacks on any other country so that country can defand himself through hyderogen bomb tha's why the hydrogen bomb is efficient.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
there is no need cuz it can **** destroy the world.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I love the Hydrogen Bomb a war can be over in hours and no US lives will be in danger. It should be used in all parts of the Mid East, and North Korea. Maybe in Mexico too
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I selected this option, because the hydrogen bomb is very destructive more 100 times than the atom bomb. The devastation it could lead to people around the world is very dangerous.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
weed
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
cause its good
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because the hydrogen bomb is needed to protect the USA from dangerous enemies.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
no
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** no
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
for more exciting war
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It's not an invention... but a discovery. The energy output from this type of reaction (via stars) is critical for life. Eventually we may harness our own hydrogen reactions to a more practical purpose... But a bomb is a crude yet critical first step in our understanding of this marvel of physics.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
stronger bomb
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
once this bomb is used, to its fullest possible intent, it or the atomic bomb will never be needed again
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because of power everything wants power
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
BIGGER BOOM
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Big Boom.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Those who speak out against violence only have the power to do so by those willing to commit violence on their behalf.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
To destroy Iraq and our other enemies, we need strong nuclear weapons
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Such a powerful weapon serves as a buffer that can prevent international conflict. If the aforementioned weapons had never been constructed, the world, most likely, would have hosted numerous other "World Wars". The creations of destruction we fear so much are, in fact, a tool to create a world in relative peace. That being said, these creations do pose a serious and credible threat to the existence of humanity. That is precisely why thermonuclear weapons must be respected and only used if the situation is truly dire.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
unlimited possiblities
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
There's no limit to the damage
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Nuclear deterrence; to deter other nations from useing nuclear strike capabilities.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
we obviously dont need that powerful of a weapon because if it got in the wrong hands it could wipe out billions of people
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Ever heard the quote "Were our own enemy". Because we basically are,we are making weapons that could wipe out 1-5% of the population(PER BOMB). i picked the hydrogen bomb because i want to see what everyones reactions are going to be when U.S or Russia launches one of these to one another.Not a lot of people have seen what the governments could come up with.Just like in 1945, Everyone was surprised,even the president himself.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
war. war never changes
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because it's more powerful and simply has the power to eliminate 3 or maybe even 5 armies!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Curiousity.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It can kill aliens
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Curious
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More power.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
To kill terriosts
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
cause its BO$$
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** North KOrea

  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
hgfgtryhht6uw
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
To easily stop China from becoming an unstoppable bully in the Asian region...to contain North Korea for its belligerent attitude and to stop Iran from ultimately becoming a nuclear-powered country....
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
H bombs are more powerfull, less radioactive area that will be affected. Plus much more engergy is produced when there is fusion
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because a H bomb just adds to the a bomb
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
To preserve the peace you must sometimes have the threat of total destruction.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
to kill people
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
**** the **** nuke em all :))
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because you are able to defend your country in a more powerful manner than with atom bombs, it also helps as a intiragation type use, say, if you shoot that rocket, we will show you Mr.Hydrogen bomb.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
workedon the bomb 1945-1947
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
When faced with enemies with the resources for nuclear war, steps must be taken in order to keep the unthinkable from happening. I see the Hydrogen bomb as a "failsafe" or last resort. If our ememies have weapons of mass destruction... well then we need to make bigger ones.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
hysrogen is a non pollutant but powerful
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It is totally epic and more destructive
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Hydrogen bomb is not a atom bomb as it is more powerful than an atom bomb. It is 10 times powerful than an atom bomb. We should not use hydrogen because it cause distruction !!!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
jeswi mohamed ali jandoubi rue malassin 4167*1.tunis.
The Hydrogen Bomb works off the principle of nuclear fusion. It is better than the Atomic Bomb for two distinct reasons. 1 The Hydrogen bomb is a much more powerful bomb therefor it takes much less materials to make. 2. The hydrogen bomb is a much cleaner bomb. The Atomic bomb as it was made deteriorated into lead over a long stretch of time, whereas the Hydrogen Bomb Deteriorates far more quickly into Helium making it have far less toxic fallout. While the hydrogen bomb does have an Atomic core the core is mostly incinerated by the initial explosion. Personally if I had the choice I would say I wish neither of these were ever invented. But in retrospect the Atomic Bomb did give us nuclear power. Hopefully we will have fusion power soon (Once we learn how to safely contain and channel such enormous power) it would be much cleaner and leave us less radioactive waste.

Related Questions

Related Comparisons