Red Cross vs. Salvation Army

  • comments 32
  • views40,277

Difference between Red Cross and Salvation Army

Some wonder, which is better; the Red Cross or the Salvation Army. Many people are familiar with both of these organizations, however if you are not, here is some information that you may not already know and some of these facts could amaze you. Here are some things which people should know in order to understand better what they do and how they operate.

Social Services

Both Red Cross and the Salvation Army work to help those who need some help. They are considered to be a part of social services. They don't bill or make people pay for the services that they offer. They are a not-for-profit organization which means that they rely greatly on the donations that they get from individuals as that is how they get a large portion of their funding. Since they are not-for-profit, they can get more government assistance in the form of grants. However, this is a downfall as well due to the fact that if government decides to cut moneys, they are often cut in the sense of social services budgets. Both organizations must rely on those who contribute to fill in where the government can not.

Services Offered

Many people know the Red Cross as the people who draw blood and keep it on supply. The Red Cross helps with natural disasters offering clothing and shelter as well. While they both have many opportunities in which they serve, the Red Cross is more supportive of overseas work when natural disasters strike.

The Salvation Army has community centers which offer day care and church among other services, they take up a collection during Christmas where people donate money to those ringing bells outside of groceries and department stores, and they have a thrift store that sells mostly used clothing, furniture and household items.

International Services

The Red Cross goes to disaster stricken areas and stays for longer period of time. Not to mention, the Red Cross is who one calls when they need to get in touch with military personnel if there is an emergency.

The Salvation Army works more with people who are in the US. They do help with natural disasters and there have been such instances where there have been national disasters and they have loaded up teams to go help in affected areas. They have taken up food collections and clothing collections as well as money collections.

Similarities and Differences

They have many things that set them apart from one another, but they both help people in the time of need.

Both step up during times of a natural disaster. Red Cross does more natural disaster work while Salvation Army works to help low income families. Salvation Army and Red Cross are full time social services organizations which work for the good of those in need throughout the year.

 
 

comments 32 Comments

  • Brad B . 3+ yrs. ago

The red cross keeps money for themselves,and barely any goes to people in need. 90% of all collected from Salvation Army goes to the people. THAT is the most important fact!

  • Pat Kerber . 3+ yrs. ago

Liar. 89.6% of donations to the Red Cross go to the victims. Get your facts straight before slandering organizations.

  • Tory . 3+ yrs. ago

The Red Cross keeps 9% of monetary donations for their overhead. That's not that bad but the problem is that the Red Cross is limited in what it can do. Their main focus is on taking in money and buying material supplies to transport to hard hit areas. Things like blankets and tents. The problem however is that blankets and tents are not always what's needed and in many cases the supply of said is insufficient. In other words the Red Cross has lots of money but the market doesnt have enough goods to purchase. Further, the Red Cross is like a triage operation. They com in fast and leave early. Other organizations like the Salvation Army (and many others) come in and stay, often becoming part of the community or were already part of the community.

They end up giving much of it away to other relief agencies who are in a better position to help. The Red Cross has its place but people tend to blindly give without really thinking about where its going.

  • Francis P. Sforza . 3+ yrs. ago

To all the Pat Kerber's in America check out 'WILLIAM BOYCE THOMPSON/RED CROSS', the "FED'S" first 'PRIVATE BANKING SHILL', he was Woodrow Wilson's-&-his-alter-ego, Colonel Edward Mandel House's choice to "FRANCHISE-THE-RED-CROSS-USING-OUR-MILITARY" to infiltrate RUSSIA using "TECHNOLOGY" during the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 while Czar Nicholas II went by-by … the Russians called W.B. Thompson the 'American Czar' & they gave him 'NICKS' opera seats to return favors. G. Edward Griffin wrote the book, "THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND". It's about the most blatant scam in history, cause of wars, boom-bust cycles, inflation, depression, prosperity. What it tells us is what our-Lovely-Orange-Pelted-TRUMPSTER-PRESIDENT has been saying all along … "WE'VE BEEN IN BED WITH THE RUSSIANS FOR A 100 YEARS" & now TERRORISM-&-THE-MUSLIMS-REPLACE-COMMUNISM … HELLO

  • Jay . 3+ yrs. ago

Check your meds, dude. The dose seems light.

  • caryn v zandt . 3+ yrs. ago

THAT'S NOT A FACT. IT'S RUMOR. And you're helping to spread that rumor. Check the real facts, first. All organizations have flaws you can leap on, but how does th De Red Cross compare to what YOU have done in disaster relief? I, on the other hand, have actually worked with both agencies in disaster relief. They were both there all the time. Where were YOU?

  • Chris . 3+ yrs. ago

Ask the people of Port Aransas and Rockport Texas where the Red Cross was after hurricane Harvey! A couple of people doing an assessment for 1 day in Port A and little or no presence in Rockport. The rebuilding there started with the citizens and voluteers (yes I was there many weekends, helping clean up and brining down supplies). The focus was on Houston and their area but unfortunately they did not bother coming down where the was little or no press.

  • M Martin . 3+ yrs. ago

My father helped dig out earthquake victims in Calif years ago. The Red Cross was there CHARGING the relief workers 25 cents for a cup of coffee which could be purchased for 5 cents anywhere at that time. They don’t get money from anyone in our family. Do we donateso relief workers can be fleeced by them.

  • Kerry Marris . September 2021

This is such an insane lie. I don't understand why you would make up something like this that's demonstrably false. If nothing else, who the **** sells coffee for 5 cents? What a complete fabricated lie.

  • Sally Erickson . December 2021

Brad I am not for or against the Red Cross but you have your figures wrong. Only 10 cents of every dollar given to Red Cross goes to admin. fees. That is a very good for a large charity.. 90% go to help the people. Please do your research before you write things down for others to view. Check out Charity watch or charity navigator for CORRECT information. Thanks!

Post a Comment
  • Name*
  • Email*