You have completley mis-written the concept of a modern constitutional monarchy.
because if we change the flag it will take a long time to desingn the flag
In monarchy the head of state does not belong to any political party and is taught from a young age to represent their country and its people. Monarchs are usually the most popular and famous than the presidents. And when the monarch dies, there is the automatic succession, so do not spend millions on elections.
It`s cool
the monarch's power unites people
i love kingdom
Born to reign = better ruler and leader!
With a republic you have so many people talking at once that it just seems like noise and nothing gets done. With a monarchy you have one final stern voice that has no affiliation with a political party and does what is best for the country. This is not to say that i believe in an absolute monarchy.
Just look at the history of the last two hundred years. The worst atrocities against humanity have been committed in the name of freedom and were committed by republics: French Revolution, Bolshevik Revolution, the overthrow of the Emperor of China, and let's not forget that **** Germany was also a republic.
less corruption
Porque es ajena a la alternancia de grupos progresistas y promueve la unidad e identidad nacional
Because in my opinion there can be no peace without order.A monarchy is order where as a republic is chaos(will of the people) ruling a nation is huge responsibility,and it takes someone with a special insight and a birthright to take on such a role.If i can give you an example as to why a monarchy is the only true and right form of government let me explain, take an 18 wheeler for example , you know someone with a certain kind of skill and responsibility can and should only operate that vehicle right, would you want ten people trying to drive that big truck at once or would you prefer to have one specially skilled person behind the wheel of that big truck, what do you think will happen if more than one person attempted to drive that vehicle at once, That's right things would turn to chaos and disorder if more than one person was operating that vehicle instead of one person. so that's pretty much my comparison of a monarchy and a republic.
because a republic is just complete ****!
BECAUSE! IT'S A MONARCHY! I MEAN COME ON!
I wanted to choose the two. Because there are the constitutionnal monarchy, what is between monarchy and republic. (sorry but I'm french. My english is very bad)
because the head of the state is not changed every 4-5 years, but is someone who commits for his/her entire life
it is permanant and stable institution.it can not buy and sell by foreign hand.
A monarchy is more peaceful, because you don't have all the arguments and tensions that come with decision making in a republic.
i dunno
because it has to pass through more houses and is more democratic
WHO GIVES A ****
beacuse its coooool!!!!
It is already choosen, and it is a family we have followed during centuries
I LIKE TRAINS TOO
look at russia!
the good of ALL people not Rich Lobbyists
Because there nice
Cus Yolo
because there is only one king or queen who rules the country
It seems that there are more revolutions in Republics given that they were generally created through revolution - hence it is part of the culture.
I know many of us Americans never even question a Republic/Democracy because of what we are always told. A Monarchy makes the Leader fully responsible to the people, and doesn't have the confusion & division the US has today. Everyday thousands of people loose their jobs & Homes and do not know who is at fault! Criminals in the Government are getting away with invading other countries, stealing, killing and no one can stop it! Communism is not a Monarchy. In the US the Leader only serves 4-8 years and always ends up answering to the highest bidder and not the people. That way of leadership creates corruption and cannot take responsibility for leading, it just points the finger. This is why we have 2 parties. If a president is bad for the people, his only consequence is no Re-election. If a King is bad for the people, it's off with his head. There is no such thing as a perfect way to Lead the people. But it's too late now, most of the people are brainwashed with many layers of propaganda, it's very hard to find the true criminals of mankind. But here's a hint... Find out who runs, Hollywood, Media, Banks, Government, Academia colleges & education, Courts, & politics. The answer will be one u would never expect and will be hard to even consider them as such. Why? What's the one race/religious group never characterized as a villain (negative), but only shown in a positive Light?
there is emphasis on order
****
cuz i said so
because with a republic many people are constantly fighting over what should be a law, in the monarchy whatever the king/queen decides is final and is to be obeyed.
Fear of consequences it a revolt takes place, but fails.
because a monarchy has a less chaotic system of power ideal for quick thinking situations
Because a monarchy is of natural order wheras a republic is based on communism and chaos,with a monarchy you have the right people in charge that are qualified to be head of state and run a country, but in a republic you have vile opportunistic dirty rotten politicians who are there just for the fame and glory and are in no way capable nor qualified to run a country. Monarchs are bred from birth to lead and have the right qualities to do so,a country needs a king not a politician.
I'm thinking about the nationalist socialists throughout the world overthrowing monarchy resulting in much less peaceful governments. Monarchy seems to work on good relations with other nations in modern times; I also live in Sweden an extremely peaceful monarchy
Because as a monarch they're is no faffle with the voting and electing.
Hello name is isais
there is no competion as who becomes a leader
I HAVE MONARCH POWERS PRESIDENT (CHIEF EXECUTIVE PAKISTAN) ONE HEAD OF STATE/GOVT.ORDERED FULL ACTION AGAINST EVILS IN PAKISTAN WHICH HAVE NOT ANY POWER IN PAKISTAN,I AM PERMANENT ACTIVE IN MUNICIPAL CORPORATION LAHORE FROM 17-03-1976 OF MONARCH PAKISTAN TOWN HALL LAHORE.603-EME.MALL LAHORE.INSIDE PAF SHAHEEN FOUNTAIN ROSE GARDEN (INTELLIGENCE MY FATHER MOST HONORABLE MR.BASHIR A.MAAN GLASGOW COMMANDER-BRITISH-EMPIRE UNITED KINGDOM HEAD QUARTERS WEST.I AGREED 100% WITH HIM.M.MANSHA VIRK.PLEASE GUIDE TO ME AS MONARCH POWER PAKISTAN.LIKE PLEASE.I AM WORRIED.OKAY.
there's unity
the monarchy is the head of state and so the people do not have to vote which will lead to disagreement and arguements
..
Live in one; seems pretty peaceful compared to certain republics out there!
because most republics around the world have had civil unrest,civil wars or cruel dictators and regimes
History.
Inb4 Liberal/Miguelist/Carlist wars.
The U.S. has been involved in a war ever since its existence.
A monarchy provides this country with great role models, such as Prince William, for this distraught generation to look up to. Also, there isn't a person in the world that doesn't at least know of the Royal Family. They generate billions annually in revenue through tourism, and add amazing prestige value to our nation.
It's awesome
I love Jesus and he is royalty to me I am more into Israel and england than america poliic stuff
Avoid all the tensions and political affairs
no and because I can
Monarchs for the most part tend to be apolitical and additionally, wish to see their line continue and in doing so, would avoid unnecessary wars when possible. Also, a look at the human rights situation around the world can be enlightening on this subject as every one of the worst dictatorships, even those with hereditary succession are considered republics and in fact, many of the worst incidences of human rights abuse (**** and communist holocausts, rise and fall of Saddam Hussein, the chaos and corruption in Latin America, wars in Afghanistan, etc.). While detractors may ask about the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Saudis were pretty much a dynasty of desert bandit chieftains who got lucky and conquered the the oil fields, Mecca, and Medina and were allied with religious fanatics who also happened to be bandits- i.e. imagine if an Italian mafia clan aligned itself with some christian hardliners and took over Italy.
They're much more organized.
Beast
It's inherently more stable. Compare Yougslavia to Sweden or Britain
Looking at history, countries with republics including communist ones or democratic ones are always unstable abd always at war or in some turnoil. Monarchy provides stability and a common neutral identity
In a monarchy the fact that there is one ruler makes it harder for a political party or corporation to take over which ensures some stabllity for the people. Having a defined hierarchy helps provide peace and development
Compare Commonwealth nations to most republics, they're happier, wealthier, cleaner, and more peaceful with a monarch as head of state. Countries like Netherlands or Norway or Sweden with monarchs are also peaceful mostly
Monarchy > Democracy
Happiness levels in monarchies = evidence
Monarchy ensures stability
Monarchs can be removed if needed but as long as they are good, rule forever. Better a kind king than a constantly changing cruel republic
Monarchy
There is still a Magna Carta and Charter of Rights for most British subjects
Monarchy helps give people a common identity to unite on rather than argue about
Monarchy because have you seen the last 100 years of instability, genocide, and war commited by republics...
Republics tend to have war
Republics are usually genocidal
Republics get corrupted faster...
Most republics dont uphold their supposed values of freedom
Having a kind king or queen provides stable lives
Monarchy countries are happier
You can still vote for a parliament in monarchy and if the parliament tries to wreck the country the monarchy can step in
Monarchy= defined safer hierarchy
Definitely a peaceful king or queen over political campaigns and war
More peaceful
Better form of government more efficient
Monarchs tend to respect the people more than presidents who have corporate agendas now
Peace and happiness
Less war and hate
Stability
Safer
Better public image
Better at peace
Happier citisens
Monarchies have better stats in most categories
Stable culture, more unified
Yep definitely unity
United front
Kind monarch means kind government
monarchy helps as a backup plan if parliament doesnt work out
STABLE
STABILITY
Better system
Less corrupt
Lasts longer
Unified
Yes
People are better looked after
More protections
Definitely the stable one
Important
Love it
More freedom
asdfghjkl
The monarch is the state so anything that makes the state look bad makes the monarch look bad. They’ve also grown with knowledge on not just how to run their country but the on the people and communities inside the country so by the time they become king/queen they know exactly what to do and what is best for the country. Monarchy also eliminates the divisiveness that comes with democracy eg brexit and Trump and monarchy doesn’t allow extremism to flourish like republics do eg communism and nazism
