Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster or Japanese Nuclear Disaster: Which is the worst nuclear disaster?

  • Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster
  • Japanese Nuclear Disaster
Please select one to answer and see the result

Answers

Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster - 32Japanese Nuclear Disaster - 18
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
From what I've gathered, it sounds like people were much less prepared for Chernobyl. There is also the fact that graphite was used at Chernobyl instead of water, and that there was no containment structure.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
It was horrible, but japaneese isnt over yet, so i can't be sure.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Cause it was
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because Russians are ****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because i said so
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because communists are the best at everying that they do. #1 NUCLEAR DISATER ALL THE WAY
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I choose this answer because when the Chernobyl happened the people didn't know how to response and panicked. But the people in Japan did know how to protect the people and would protect the people at all costs.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Beacouse
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
it still doesnt happen a japan.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
You have to remember, with Chernobyl, severe fallout was a result and severe amounts of Caesium-137 are found just miles from Reactor 4, in the ghost cities of Pripyat and Chernobyl. We're talking about a worst-caste scenerio that is still silently spewing radioactive dust from a fractured sarcophogus within Reactor 4. But with Fukushima, even though a full meltdown has occurred at reactor 1 (May 2011....this forum is old), the molten fuel is still within the shattered containment facility. Other reactors have gone down the TMI path; partial meltdowns. Only Reactor 1, which has COMPLETELY melted down, is a hazard. But even though this sounds like another Chernobyl on the way, it won't be. Chernobyl lacked one thing; a containment structure.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Czernobyl is first nuclear disaster. All Russia try to stop Chernobyl catastrophe, but they don't know what to do.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
no one has died from japan's nuclear accident.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
mmmmmm
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Chernobyl was less prepared for a disaster, so more radiation escaped into the air. Fukushima Was more prepared and had better safety precautions.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Core explosion, release in the high atmosphere
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
since the technology in that period was very low, they were not able to meet u with their needs immediately.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Hello,
I remember Chernoybl because I was in High School and it's just like Japan is today very bad and people are getting sick.
From,
Allan
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Chernobyl is agreed to not be inhabitable, While there still is a chance for Fukishima.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I;M JUST HOPING
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
All in all the Japaneese Nuclear disaster is for all practical purposes tamed and contained. Thanks God.

  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
I do believe the Japanese were better prepared for such an disaster. The Japanese has opened it's doors for help from all over as opposed to the Chernobyl Disaster taking place in a Soviet country which would have been more reluctant to accept outside assistance and was slower on the gun in my opinion. Also the disaster in Chernobyl originated within the nuclear plant while the Japanese disaster was the fault of the earthquake so it was a more limited nuclear disaster ,but no more less serious by any means.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Era, lack of commununucation/secrecy, cold war egos
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Chernobyl reactor was generating much greater amounts of power than the Japanese reactors.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Chernoble was older and untested. There were not adequate defenses put in place such as being housed in a containable structure. The chernoble was a much bigger system, therefore the damage was more threatening.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Problem is ongoing. I doubt they will ever be able to re-populate a huge area of their country. We hosted a child from Chernobyl for the summer a few years ago. Some of the things she told us about "home" were heartbreaking. Radiation isn't the only problem there of course but I think they have less capacity and cash to deal with the issues that the ordinary people face.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
No Containment in Chernobyl, mmassige reactor meltdown, massive release widespread radiantion. Many on site deaths
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
it had more contamination
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The people were unprepared and had little experience with this technology.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Much more nuclear fallout spread over a greater amount of land, thus more people displaced.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Chernobyl is pretty bad
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
idk
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
lack of transparency
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because Japnese disaster is getting worse and doesn't seems to be solved.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because Japanese people are ****
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Because I just think that - from reading bits and pieces on the net and seeing images. If it was just the earthquake, I believe the nuclear stations would have held up. I just feel so sorry for all those people in Japan
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The Chernobyl disaster did not disrupt a major first world economy, manufacturing and business area. The Japanese nuclear disaster did.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
More people got killed
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
more and more bad news just keeps coming and it seems to be worse than the officials will admit.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
listen thumb me up if u think is pretty intersting. this held me get a great on my report. remember thumbs me up.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
1 reactor vs 4 in japan, the reactors are still burning in japan, within a month chernobyl had a sarcophycus. Japans 4 reactors do not simple math!
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
because it had been cause by an earthquake and it had also triggered a tsunami, so that is why i think it was more effective and harming
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Smaller country, higher population, it will affect way more people.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The radioactive water, thats now in the ocean.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
?
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
30 years after Chernobyl, there should never be a nuclear meltdown, period.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Two reactors in Japan vs. one in Chernobyl and they are pumping radioactive water into the ocean at an alarming rate vs. Chernobyl which was located in a relatively desolate area and didn't pump water into the ocean,
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The cover up is so pervasive that the real solution to fixing the problem may NEVER be put in place before they pollute the entire pacific ocean
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
Think about that for a minute nimrod.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
The disaster is releasing radiation into the sea, groundwater and is still ongoing.
  • Anonymous . 3+ yrs. ago
way more radiation.

Related Questions

Related Comparisons