﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Time Travel vs. Wormhole: Which is more plausible? | reComparison</title><link>http://www.reComparison.com/rss/comments/?c=100750</link><description>Comments from Time Travel vs. Wormhole: Which is more plausible?</description><copyright>(c) 2026, reComparison.com. All rights reserved.</copyright><item><title>Jasmine</title><description>What is your degree in?</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100750/time-travel-vs-wormhole-which-is-more-plausible/#comment4232</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 01:50:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>William</title><description>Non-wormhole based time travel requires either 1)unphysically large angular momentum densities, or 2) travel at speeds greater than light. By contrast, numerous submicroscopic wormholes are generally believed to exist in every cubic meter...</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100750/time-travel-vs-wormhole-which-is-more-plausible/#comment2088</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:25:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>