﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>NTFS vs. FAT32: Which one works for you? | reComparison</title><link>http://www.reComparison.com/rss/comments/?c=100610</link><description>Comments from NTFS vs. FAT32: Which one works for you?</description><copyright>(c) 2026, reComparison.com. All rights reserved.</copyright><item><title>SADDI SHAH</title><description>IF we want collect loss of data than NTFS is better than FAT and in case of networking than NTFS is relay-able in booth condition NTFS is most rely-able</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100610/ntfs-vs-fat32-which-one-works-for-you/#comment690</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:14:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Guest4567</title><description>Pro Tools (any version) will not record onto a FAT32 hard drive.  If you intend to use your computer to make or record music, FAT32 will not work.</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100610/ntfs-vs-fat32-which-one-works-for-you/#comment450</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:40:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>