﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Scribd vs. DocStoc: Better document storage site? | reComparison</title><link>http://www.reComparison.com/rss/comments/?c=100579</link><description>Comments from Scribd vs. DocStoc: Better document storage site?</description><copyright>(c) 2026, reComparison.com. All rights reserved.</copyright><item><title>Manoj Ranaweera</title><description>Just an update on my own comment. We now serve both HTML5 and Flash for documents uploaded since back of Jan 2012. You can manually convert old documents to HTML5.</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100579/scribd-vs-docstoc-better-document-storage-site/#comment3197</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:52:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Thor Meijer</title><description>You are incorrect on one point - Scribd now uses HTML5 to display most documents. Docstoc is 100% Flash based and requires Flash plugins in order to display documents.</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100579/scribd-vs-docstoc-better-document-storage-site/#comment352</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 12:33:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>reComparison</title><description>Hi Manoj,

Appreciate your feedback. We will include an edocr comparison in a future article. 

Thanks,
reComparison Team</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100579/scribd-vs-docstoc-better-document-storage-site/#comment258</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 19:58:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Manoj Ranaweera</title><description>Hi, I am the CEO of http://edocr.com and would appreciate if you review our products in addition to the two products covered in your post.

Its interesting you used the terms "document storage". We like to think we are in the "document...</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100579/scribd-vs-docstoc-better-document-storage-site/#comment231</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:42:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>