﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Ruby vs. Emerald | reComparison</title><link>http://www.reComparison.com/rss/comments/?c=100247</link><description>Comments from Ruby vs. Emerald</description><copyright>(c) 2026, reComparison.com. All rights reserved.</copyright><item><title>drue</title><description>Price-wise, emeralds are only second to diamonds. I wonder why, Considering they look better and are harder to get than diamonds,</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100247/ruby-vs-emerald/#comment8006</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:16:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>me</title><description>hey catherine</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100247/ruby-vs-emerald/#comment694</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:42:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>me</title><description>youre mom boy</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100247/ruby-vs-emerald/#comment693</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:41:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>ne</title><description>eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100247/ruby-vs-emerald/#comment692</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:38:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>James</title><description>I prefer Pokemon Ruby for the Gameboy Advance because of the pokemon you can capture and you don't need to do as many quests as in Emerald,The downside for me is that you cannot catch the legendary pokemon from Pokemon Shappire in Ruby...</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100247/ruby-vs-emerald/#comment91</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:10:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>