http://www.reComparison.com/rss/comments/?c=100227Comments from Coal Energy vs. Nuclear Energy(c) 2026, reComparison.com. All rights reserved.Finally someone who understandshttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment8602Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:54:49 GMTObviously you are deluded toohttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment8601Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:54:14 GMTyou are a deluded human being. if you think that nuclear energy is worse for the environment you are just a stubborn ecologist that is getting involved with things you don't understandhttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment8600Mon, 21 Oct 2019 23:53:31 GMTRenewable forms of energy such as wind and solar are worth developing, but they are both intermittent and tiny pieces of the overall pie compared to nuclear power plants, which supply about 20% of the US's electric power and at a capacity...https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment8437Thu, 02 May 2019 22:18:28 GMTcoal publications would suggest the commodity isn't going anywhere. Coal reports show if we have to live with it, we may as well reduce the impact of coal and CCS seems to be the best solution found to date. Cherry www.coalportal.com...https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment3207Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:18:19 GMTnuclear energy and coal are both wrong but theres little we can do. we can try to stop it but some one out there will always start it again. both energy sources lead to diseases, death and mutation etc. at some point i hope a way to solve...https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment1836Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:52:30 GMTGo nukes! there are only 3 nuke accidents in the past hale centuary! With the growing population nuclear energy is betterhttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment1705Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:01:57 GMTbicth mother fucker suck on my big dickhttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment1196Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:28:41 GMTagvsgfnjklukluydnjvgrfsdfhgfhjgfhttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment1195Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:20:36 GMTthis suckshttps://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment1194Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:16:24 GMTNucular energy dosn't polute. The only thing it leaves is nucular waste, which we could just leave in Anartica or blast it into outer space.https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment728Tue, 02 Nov 2010 12:27:40 GMTPeople need to get out of this unfounded 1990's Captain Planet hate on for Nuclear Power, The newest reactors are able to use the spent material to generate power which makes the amount of waste next to nothing in comparison to the...https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment664Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:11:31 GMTcan u tell me the chart of comparison beteewn conventional fuel vs. nuclear energy. and also send that the cost comparison of them.. pl help me...https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment532Sun, 08 Aug 2010 04:31:44 GMTboth energy sources are unacceptable. too many people have become diseased or worse from coal and nuclear garbage and mistakes. i know we have better ideas on the table. who's going to get the old guys out of the way.https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment437Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:04:50 GMTHey ,Nuclear energy is not green as we do not have discovered any 100% full proof plan for the disposal of wastes. All the N-waste creates hazardous concerns which are more dreadful than coal https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100227/coal-energy-vs-nuclear-energy/#comment299Sun, 30 May 2010 01:51:49 GMT