﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>MIT vs. Stanford | reComparison</title><link>http://www.reComparison.com/rss/comments/?c=100191</link><description>Comments from MIT vs. Stanford</description><copyright>(c) 2026, reComparison.com. All rights reserved.</copyright><item><title>John</title><description>mofo</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100191/mit-vs-stanford/#comment3336</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:25:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>John</title><description>FYI, i don't know when this MIT vs Stanford article was posted but, in present time, 2012, stanford and MIT are ranked number 5 or 6 in the country, not 9 and 16</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100191/mit-vs-stanford/#comment3335</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:24:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>DLW</title><description>I guess there are no proof-readers? Or people that speak English? That was terribly written and often hard to decipher. I suggest someone goes back through this and takes out all the unnecessary fluff that was put in to make the author...</description><link>https://recomparison.com/comparisons/100191/mit-vs-stanford/#comment3167</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:12:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>